Student:staff ratios 2008-2010 graph
One way to hide cuts to funding is to stick more students in each tutorial, lecture and class. But, after a while students and staff start to notice.

You are here: TEU – Tertiary Education Union / Education / Student:staff ratios 2008-2010 graph
One way to hide cuts to funding is to stick more students in each tutorial, lecture and class. But, after a while students and staff start to notice.
Tags: funding
Support the University of CanterburySeptember 16, 2011, 12:09 pm
Student:staff ratios 2008-2010 graphSeptember 21, 2011, 9:17 am
University staff seek assurance reviews will not increase...March 22, 2012, 9:34 am
Submit for Fairness at WorkAugust 18, 2010, 10:57 am
A good view doesn’t make for a world class universityAugust 24, 2011, 3:59 pm
Fairness at WorkApril 20, 2009, 5:38 pm
Overpressure in Education, 1885May 18, 2012, 3:45 pm
Employment law changesMay 17, 2012, 9:19 am
Petition to keep university councils democraticMay 17, 2012, 8:45 am
MIT nixes fundraising BBQMay 17, 2012, 8:43 am
Budget 2012 previewMay 17, 2012, 8:38 am
Commission agrees with TEU’s PBRF adviceMay 17, 2012, 8:36 am
No graph visible!
HI Lawrence – We'll try to fix that. But in the meantime, if you cannot see the graph in your web browser, try this: http://twitter.com/#!/nzteu/status/11554452595868…
I can see the graph now, but I wish I couldn't! This is one of the worst displays of data I have ever seen. The staff:student ratios are represented by the numbers of irregularly sized students… I believe that what the eye perceives, the areas occupied by the drawings, do not in fact accurately represent the numbers, and even if they did the human mind is very bad at comparing areas, particularly irregularly shaped ones. One can barely tell that the last 'heap' is the largest. One must actually count the students in each picture to get the point!
I'm not sure how this is supposed to be more compelling than just the three numbers, 17.9, 19.2, and 19.8.
I agree with Beatrix — this is a very poor example of visual statistics.
I have to agree – this graphic is more confusing that informative.