• General staff
    • Groups
  • Trades and vocations
  • Women
  • Māori
    • Waiata
  • Library
  • Issues
  • Call us free: 0800 278 348
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Join our Facebook Group
  • Subscribe to our RSS Feed
  • Search Site

  • Home
  • Join
    • Join
    • Why join TEU?
    • Subscriptions
    • Member benefits
    • Associate membership
    • How to recruit
    • Recruitment resources
    • Top reasons to join TEU
    • Endorsements
  • About
    • Structure
    • Library
    • History
    • Subscriptions
    • Calendar
    • Policies and submissions
    • TEU rules and constitution
    • Links
    • Common abbreviations
  • News
    • Media enquiries
    • Media Releases
    • Tertiary Update
    • Feeds and email updates
    • Submit your own webpage content
  • Contact
    • TEU people
    • Check your details
    • Submit your own webpage content
  • Collective Agreements
  • Find your branch
    • Universities
      • AUT
      • University of Auckland
      • University of Waikato
      • Massey University
      • Victoria University of Wellington
      • University of Canterbury
      • Lincoln University
      • University of Otago
    • ITPs North Island
      • NorthTec
      • Unitec
      • Manukau Institute of Technology
      • Waikato Institute of Technology
      • Bay of Plenty Polytechnic
      • Eastern Institute of Technology
      • Waiāriki
      • WITT
      • UCOL (Universal College of Learning)
      • Whitireia
      • The Open Polytechnic
      • Wellington Institute of Technology
    • ITPs South Island
      • Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology
      • Christchurch Polytechnic
      • Tai Poutini Polytechnic
      • Aoraki Polytechnic
      • Otago Polytechnic
      • Southern Institute of Technology
    • Wananga
      • Te Wananga o Aotearoa
      • Te Whare Wananga o Awanuiarangi
    • Other Organisations
      • NZCER
      • REAPs
      • Auckland Institute of Studies
      • Te Tari Puna Ora o Aotearoa / New Zealand Childcare Association
      • Parents as First Teachers – Plunket
      • Trade & Commerce Centre Ltd.
      • Other Organisations

You are here: TEU – Tertiary Education Union / Employment / Victoria University’s Crime and Justice Research Centre (CJRC): The Facts

Victoria University’s Crime and Justice Research Centre (CJRC): The Facts

20 Jul 2011 / Comments Off / in Employment, Victoria University of Wellington/by TEU

20 July 2011

The Crime and Justice Research Centre (CJRC) is unique in being the only applied research centre in New Zealand dedicated to researching crime and social responses to crime. It was established in 2002, having grown out of a contract research group within theInstituteofCriminology, to which it remains closely aligned.

Over the last decade, CJRC has produced over 100 research reports, articles, books and presentations on a range of criminal justice issues of critical importance toNew Zealandsociety. The Centre has produced three national counts of crime victimisation which form the basis of crime prevention policy inNew Zealand. It has led international debates through its seminal research on Restorative Justice, Family Group Conferences and the decriminalisation of prostitution, and is recognised as a leader in research on youth justice. The Centre has researched the needs of some of society’s most severely victimised groups including the families of victims of homicide and those harmed by sexual violence. More recently it has carried out research that is contributing to the fight against family violence inNew Zealandand the Pacific.

CJRC is a business unit that is 100 percent funded through external research revenue. The Centre’s costs are covered each year through external research income; these valuable research outputs are produced at no cost to the university. In fact CJRC’s research generates funds for the university. The university receives 55 percent of overheads and the collection of the Centre’s end of year surpluses.

Change proposal

Victoria University proposes to disestablish CJRC on the basis that the Centre has shown a downward trend in external revenue, and on a prediction that a substantial increase in contracts from the public sector is unlikely.

Staff at CJRC oppose this change. The figures presented to justify the proposed disestablishment are misleading and erroneous. A more accurate picture is as follows:

  • CJRCs total income per staff member has been increasing over the last five years from $52k per staff member in 2005 up to $172,000 in 2008 and remaining high in 2010 at $142,000
  • Total income has exceeded total costs in the last four years with the Centre consistently producing surpluses averaging $56,000 per annum
  • The university’s main argument for disestablishing CJRC is that total external revenue[1] from contracts has decreased since 2006. However, there is no recognition that the number of staff working in the Centre has also decreased, along with the reduced availability of Government and other external funding. In fact surpluses have tended to increase as total external revenue has decreased
  • The Change Proposal presents poorly calculated forecasts which suggest that CJRC will have a significant deficit in 2011. The university’s forecasted figure for ‘total income’ in 2011 for CJRC is just $190,000. However, this only accounts for contracts or income already loaded in the financial accounting system and assumes CJRC would not generate any additional work in the last six months of 2011. In fact, since these figures were calculated, CJRC has already secured or had a verbal promise of a further $184,000 in additional total income. These figures project the Centre to be in surplus, even in the unlikely case that no other income was secured in the remainder of the year.
  • The university has actively prevented the Centre from being financially viable. The Research Trust currently has $117,000 of CJRC funds that have been accumulated as the result of surpluses from completed contracts. In every year to date, CJRC has had access to these funds, using them to offset unfunded activities such as tendering for external research and to cover salaries over quieter periods. In May 2011 the Research Trust denied the Centre access to $70,000 of these funds that were due to expire. This change in policy was implemented without consultation and contrary to any normal business model which allows a business to have access to surpluses to offset future deficits. This action has placed CJRC in an apparently untenable financial position.

The criminological and social significance of the research carried out by the Centre has been widely recognised by academics, government agencies and NGOs alike (please see examples in the box below) Only management at Victoria University appear to have no understanding of the value and importance of its work.

What you can do:

  • Please take a moment to make a statement to the decision panel, however brief, opposing the disestablishment of CJRC (email lillian.loftus@vuw.ac.nz, with a cc to michael.roguski@vuw.ac.nz, by midday on 3rd August 2011).

Examples of CJRC’s research

Ÿ  Measuring crime in New Zealand: CJRC has produced three national counts of crime victimisation – these counts are best estimates of the level of crime in New Zealand and form the basis of crime prevention policy in New Zealand. These reports are frequently cited in international research

Ÿ  Understanding the needs of victims: the Centre has completed one of the largest pieces of international research on effective interventions for victims of sexual violence. It has also recently completed the first piece of research in New Zealand on the families of victims of homicide

Ÿ  Alternative approaches to Criminal Justice: CJRC carried out the first outcome evaluations of Restorative Justice in New Zealand. Four reports provided internationally significant evidence of the ability of Restorative Justice to meet victims’ needs and reduce re-conviction of offenders. Research by CJRC of a pilot Public Defence Service has contributed to the continued use of publicly funded legal aid lawyers in New Zealand

Ÿ  Youth Justice Research: CJRC is recognised as a leader in Youth Justice Research having carried out a number of significant research projects including the first review ever of Family Group Conferences – a model now adopted by a number of other countries. Other research has included  the validity testing of New Zealand Police’s Youth Offending Risk Screening Tool, research on the treatment of treatment of adolescent sex offenders, alternative remand options for young offenders, police youth diversion scheme, and young offenders’ health and education assessments used by Child, Youth and Family

Ÿ  Family violence: Research by the Centre has supported the police responses to preventing domestic violence in the Pacific. The Centre has also carried out reviews on the scale and nature of family violence in New Zealand and also its impact on health, evaluations of its ‘Not Okay’ campaigns and a formative evaluation of Police Safety Orders, New Zealand Police’s latest response to fighting family violence

Ÿ  Decriminalisation of prostitution: New Zealand was the first country to decriminalise prostitution with the passing of the Prostitution Reform Act 2003. This was a controversial piece of legislation attracting considerable interest within New Zealand and internationally. CJRC conducted four pieces of research that contributed to the review of this Act, including developing the evaluation framework to review the Act

Ÿ  Other topical issues CJRC has been involved with include the Mothers and Babies in Prison Amendment Bill, the piloting of taser guns by New Zealand police, car crime and tourism, viewing habits of users of sexually explicit material, a scheme for referring arrestees for alcohol and drug assessment and treatment, evaluation of NZ police drug and alcohol education programme (DARE), ethical issues associated with the collection of DNA evidence

 


[1]               Total external revenue is the total price of a contract before the costs of the research have been taken out. Total income is the total sum actually coming back to CJRC as income.

Tags: Assessment, change proposal, Crime and Justice Research Centre, Government

Related Posts

Did you like this entry?
Here are a few more posts that might be interesting for you.
Related Posts
Victoria University of Wellington branch report 2009
Cuts and accountability no longer saving money
Big inflation pressures yet to come – CTU
No ‘nice-to-haves’ in austerity budget
Manukau votes to take action
Court rules again: it’s time for bargaining to begin
Gloomy NZIER outlook holds fears for jobs
TEU calls for wider vision from Steven Joyce
CTU challenges Key to set tone for the nation
Bullying ministers need to stop improper interference

Comments are closed.

Popular
  • Support the University of CanterburySeptember 16, 2011, 12:09 pm
  • Student:staff ratios 2008-2010 graphSeptember 21, 2011, 9:17 am
  • University staff seek assurance reviews will not increase...March 22, 2012, 9:34 am
  • Submit for Fairness at WorkAugust 18, 2010, 10:57 am
  • A good view doesn’t make for a world class universityAugust 24, 2011, 3:59 pm
  • Fairness at WorkApril 20, 2009, 5:38 pm
Recent
  • Overpressure in Education, 1885May 18, 2012, 3:45 pm
  • Employment law changesMay 17, 2012, 9:19 am
  • Petition to keep university councils democraticMay 17, 2012, 8:45 am
  • MIT nixes fundraising BBQMay 17, 2012, 8:43 am
  • Budget 2012 previewMay 17, 2012, 8:38 am
  • Commission agrees with TEU’s PBRF adviceMay 17, 2012, 8:36 am
Comments
  • [...] http://teu.ac.nz/2012/05/tpp-its-all-about-secrecy/...May 14, 8:31 am by TPPA powered letter opener «
  • [...] Petition to keep university councils democratic [...]May 17, 8:45 am by Employment law changes | TEU - Tertiary Education Union
  • [...] 0 Comments / in Education, Universities/by TEU ...May 14, 8:57 am by Petition to keep university councils democratic | TEU - Tertiary Education Union
  • [...] TEU’s written submission told the commission staff...May 10, 9:14 am by Commission agrees with TEU’s PBRF advice | TEU - Tertiary Education Union
  • [...] University council reforms will incur unneeded cost - TEU...May 7, 12:44 pm by PETITION: Keep our university councils democratic | TEU - Tertiary Education Union
  • [...] Keep our university councils democratic 14 May...May 10, 10:27 am by Keep our university councils democratic | TEU - Tertiary Education Union
Tags
academic Assessment ASTE Auckland Australia Bargaining Canterbury Children Christchurch collective agreement court CTU debt economy equity fees funding general staff Government Helen Kelly holidays inflation international students ITP MECA John Key lecturer Ministry of Education negotiations OECD Parliament pay PBRF public education Redundancies redundancy Sandra Grey Sharn Riggs Steven Joyce Tertiary Education Commission Tom Ryan tutors unemployment Waikato Wellington workload
Join TEU online

Other TEU places on the internet

Twitter
Facebook
Flickr
YouTube
Google+
LinkedIn

Subscribe to Tertiary Update

* indicates required
Email Format

RSS Support union members around the world

  • Italy: Stop victimization of anti-fascist trade union leader Matteo Parlati
  • Canada: Tell the Canadian Olympic Committee (COC) that Rio Tinto has no place in the Olympic Games
  • Iran: Stop the execution of Abdolreza Ghanbari

Enter your email address to subscribe to this website and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS He kupu o te rā

  • kaiako
    kaiako: teacher. I whakaakona ngā tamariki e te kaiako. The children were taught by the teacher. - this is an example of a passive sentence Ehara tērā wahine i te kaiako. That woman isn’t a teacher. - this is an example use of Ehara to negate an equative sentence  He tūnga matua te mahi a ngā kaiako ki te whakaako i ā tātou tamariki. A teacher's job is […]

Tag cloud

lecturer tutors Bargaining Auckland CTU international students John Key Tertiary Education Commission Parliament pay Australia equity ITP MECA debt general staff unemployment inflation court Government Wellington economy Sandra Grey Christchurch PBRF ASTE Steven Joyce funding Tom Ryan Redundancies OECD Assessment public education collective agreement holidays fees Children Canterbury Sharn Riggs Helen Kelly negotiations redundancy workload academic Ministry of Education Waikato

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
481Follower40Subscribers

Twitter Updates

  • Tapu Misa: Shared sacrifice falls unevenly nzh.tw/10807180 20 hours ago
  • @stevenljoyce's evidence-basd approach to govt review of PBRF "regardless of its outcome, the Govt would keep the fund" shar.es/q3H74 1 day ago
  • Councils to be replaced with cronies, re-Joyce! | Critic Te Arohi: bit.ly/JdEXjH 1 day ago
  • Overpressure in Education, 1885 goo.gl/fb/6IAfU 3 days ago
  • You can volunteer to stop the government's plan to undermine work rights and employment law at - goo.gl/1xIxl 3 days ago
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand License.
  • scroll to top
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Join our Facebook Group
  • Subscribe to our RSS Feed