Victoria University’s Crime and Justice Research Centre (CJRC): The Facts
20 July 2011
The Crime and Justice Research Centre (CJRC) is unique in being the only applied research centre in New Zealand dedicated to researching crime and social responses to crime. It was established in 2002, having grown out of a contract research group within theInstituteofCriminology, to which it remains closely aligned.
Over the last decade, CJRC has produced over 100 research reports, articles, books and presentations on a range of criminal justice issues of critical importance toNew Zealandsociety. The Centre has produced three national counts of crime victimisation which form the basis of crime prevention policy inNew Zealand. It has led international debates through its seminal research on Restorative Justice, Family Group Conferences and the decriminalisation of prostitution, and is recognised as a leader in research on youth justice. The Centre has researched the needs of some of society’s most severely victimised groups including the families of victims of homicide and those harmed by sexual violence. More recently it has carried out research that is contributing to the fight against family violence inNew Zealandand the Pacific.
CJRC is a business unit that is 100 percent funded through external research revenue. The Centre’s costs are covered each year through external research income; these valuable research outputs are produced at no cost to the university. In fact CJRC’s research generates funds for the university. The university receives 55 percent of overheads and the collection of the Centre’s end of year surpluses.
Change proposal
Victoria University proposes to disestablish CJRC on the basis that the Centre has shown a downward trend in external revenue, and on a prediction that a substantial increase in contracts from the public sector is unlikely.
Staff at CJRC oppose this change. The figures presented to justify the proposed disestablishment are misleading and erroneous. A more accurate picture is as follows:
- CJRCs total income per staff member has been increasing over the last five years from $52k per staff member in 2005 up to $172,000 in 2008 and remaining high in 2010 at $142,000
- Total income has exceeded total costs in the last four years with the Centre consistently producing surpluses averaging $56,000 per annum
- The university’s main argument for disestablishing CJRC is that total external revenue[1] from contracts has decreased since 2006. However, there is no recognition that the number of staff working in the Centre has also decreased, along with the reduced availability of Government and other external funding. In fact surpluses have tended to increase as total external revenue has decreased
- The Change Proposal presents poorly calculated forecasts which suggest that CJRC will have a significant deficit in 2011. The university’s forecasted figure for ‘total income’ in 2011 for CJRC is just $190,000. However, this only accounts for contracts or income already loaded in the financial accounting system and assumes CJRC would not generate any additional work in the last six months of 2011. In fact, since these figures were calculated, CJRC has already secured or had a verbal promise of a further $184,000 in additional total income. These figures project the Centre to be in surplus, even in the unlikely case that no other income was secured in the remainder of the year.
- The university has actively prevented the Centre from being financially viable. The Research Trust currently has $117,000 of CJRC funds that have been accumulated as the result of surpluses from completed contracts. In every year to date, CJRC has had access to these funds, using them to offset unfunded activities such as tendering for external research and to cover salaries over quieter periods. In May 2011 the Research Trust denied the Centre access to $70,000 of these funds that were due to expire. This change in policy was implemented without consultation and contrary to any normal business model which allows a business to have access to surpluses to offset future deficits. This action has placed CJRC in an apparently untenable financial position.
The criminological and social significance of the research carried out by the Centre has been widely recognised by academics, government agencies and NGOs alike (please see examples in the box below) Only management at Victoria University appear to have no understanding of the value and importance of its work.
What you can do:
- Please take a moment to make a statement to the decision panel, however brief, opposing the disestablishment of CJRC (email lillian.loftus@vuw.ac.nz, with a cc to michael.roguski@vuw.ac.nz, by midday on 3rd August 2011).
|
Examples of CJRC’s research Measuring crime in New Zealand: CJRC has produced three national counts of crime victimisation – these counts are best estimates of the level of crime in New Zealand and form the basis of crime prevention policy in New Zealand. These reports are frequently cited in international research Understanding the needs of victims: the Centre has completed one of the largest pieces of international research on effective interventions for victims of sexual violence. It has also recently completed the first piece of research in New Zealand on the families of victims of homicide Alternative approaches to Criminal Justice: CJRC carried out the first outcome evaluations of Restorative Justice in New Zealand. Four reports provided internationally significant evidence of the ability of Restorative Justice to meet victims’ needs and reduce re-conviction of offenders. Research by CJRC of a pilot Public Defence Service has contributed to the continued use of publicly funded legal aid lawyers in New Zealand Youth Justice Research: CJRC is recognised as a leader in Youth Justice Research having carried out a number of significant research projects including the first review ever of Family Group Conferences – a model now adopted by a number of other countries. Other research has included the validity testing of New Zealand Police’s Youth Offending Risk Screening Tool, research on the treatment of treatment of adolescent sex offenders, alternative remand options for young offenders, police youth diversion scheme, and young offenders’ health and education assessments used by Child, Youth and Family Family violence: Research by the Centre has supported the police responses to preventing domestic violence in the Pacific. The Centre has also carried out reviews on the scale and nature of family violence in New Zealand and also its impact on health, evaluations of its ‘Not Okay’ campaigns and a formative evaluation of Police Safety Orders, New Zealand Police’s latest response to fighting family violence Decriminalisation of prostitution: New Zealand was the first country to decriminalise prostitution with the passing of the Prostitution Reform Act 2003. This was a controversial piece of legislation attracting considerable interest within New Zealand and internationally. CJRC conducted four pieces of research that contributed to the review of this Act, including developing the evaluation framework to review the Act Other topical issues CJRC has been involved with include the Mothers and Babies in Prison Amendment Bill, the piloting of taser guns by New Zealand police, car crime and tourism, viewing habits of users of sexually explicit material, a scheme for referring arrestees for alcohol and drug assessment and treatment, evaluation of NZ police drug and alcohol education programme (DARE), ethical issues associated with the collection of DNA evidence |
[1] Total external revenue is the total price of a contract before the costs of the research have been taken out. Total income is the total sum actually coming back to CJRC as income.






















